Snakes! On a Plane!

Published Date: May 31st, 2006
Category: General Banter

This is truly a miracle of the modern age. When news of the upcoming and boringly-titled film ‘Pacific Air Flight 121′- starring Samuel L Jackson, in which hundreds of snakes accidentally are set free on a commercial flight- broke on the internet, it quickly became a phenomenon.

Following a blog entry made by screenwriter Josh Friedman, early hype from King Geek Harry Knowles over at Aintitcool.com, and mentions on several Internet portals; bloggers were soon creating songs, apparel, poster art, pages of fan fiction, parody films, mock movie trailers, and even a poker game.

And on the dubious hipster affection went. The film was renamed ‘Snakes on a Plane’, and underwent 5 days of re-shoots based on the wishes of ‘talkbackers’ on Aintitcool, giving it a language-and-gore R-rating. Furthermore, the phrase ‘Snakes on a Plane’ is now being used in place of ‘Shit Happens’. For example:

“I was mangled by the Black Arm of Snargle the other day.”
“Snakes on a Plane, me harty. Snakes on a Plane.”

Funniest of all, though, is that upon noticing the masses of bloggers referring to the film in the style of Sam Jackson-”Snakes on a MUTHA FUCKIN’ Plane!”-the film’s creators rewrote the script to include the line.

Will a studio listening so intently to their target audience pay off? The film is scheduled for an August 18th release date, so the effect have yet to be gauged. Until then, I predict news programmes like BBC’s Breakfast will waste airtime on ‘humorous’ articles, trying to figure out why a bunch of twenty- and thirty-somethings are so out of their mind for the film, and Sam Jackson et al will appear left, right and centre singing the praises of their ‘goofy little movie’.

Needless to say, you can bet your bottom dollar ‘Snakes on a Plane’ will do a hell of a lot better than ‘Pacific Air Flight 121′, and will spawn sequels like ‘Tigers in a Train’, ‘Goats on a Boat’ and ‘Warthogs in the Toilet’. Because for once in our lives, we know exactly what we’re getting when we hand over our well-earned cash at the Movie House/Warner Village.

Snakes. On a plane. You gotta love it!

Official Site
Funny Fan Film

5 Responses to “Snakes! On a Plane!”

Trackback this entry.

he he, i love this.
Heard that Samuel Jackson said he wouldnt shoot the movie if they changed the movie from the working title ’snakes on a plane’ to Pacific Air Flight 121

‘Goats on a Boat’ has more gusto though. I can see them running through the halls of an ocean liner, women waking up with their favourite dresses eaten to death (if dresses do indeed die) and men from the country being seduced by them to do evil biddings

I hear the original idea, ‘Jordan in a field’, was cancelled pretty quickly.

Fans of “Snakes of a Plane,” spread the word…tonight, on MSNBC, Rita Cosby will have the story of a real-life snake on a plane. A pilot landed a plane with one hand while restraining the snake in the other! “Rita Cosby: Live & Direct” will air at 10pm eastern tonight, June 6.

#4
R.A. (Rick) Smith
June 22nd, 2006 at 7:26 pm

In September 1994 I wrote and registered a film treatment entitled SNAKES. Synopsis: Poisonous snakes are freed from a crate on a passenger airplane while in flight over an ocean. The pilot is soon bitten and dies. Ultimately, the copilot, the flight attendant, and the passengers must join forces to destroy the snakes and safely land the plane. It was pitched as “JAWS” on an airplane…Snakes on a Plane? I later turned it into a screenplay, registered May 1998. A letter from New Line Cinema’s attorneys told me in essence that if I make a claim, they’ll huff and puff til they blow my house down. Who and where is David Daleassandro? Has anyone seen his screenplay? New Line’s attorneys told me on 1/14/05 that Snakes on a Plane originated with a screenplay written by him. If this is so, why did he have to go to WGA to receive a credit? And the name change (Pacific Air Flight 121) was after I sent New Line proof of the pitch for SNAKES: “JAWS” on an airplane. Snakes on a Plane? ? ?

Emmm….

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)